Tag Archives: health care

Saturday Top 5: Reasons to Support Obama

This top 5 list will discuss the top 5 reasons to vote for Barack Obama for POTUS. Please read only if you can handle opinions and views with which you may or may not agree without getting too mad or hurt.

Honorable Mention:
The world hates us and with Obama as president, the world will love us. We want to know why the terrorists hate us so we can stop making them so mad. Besides, we saw how much the world loved us when Carter and Clinton were president. We had an attempt on the twin towers in 96, and multiple embassy attacks under Carter’s term. Besides, these poor brutal dictators just need us to sit down and talk to them and then they will come around. Who cares if it lends legitimacy to their evil regimes? Oops, did I say evil? I meant “misunderstood”.

#5 Health Care/Insurance is a right! Roughly 47 million people in America do not have health insurance. Under Barack Obama, those of us who have a job and pay for insurance will get to make sure that everyone who does not have health insurance (including rough 12-15 million illegal immigrants) gets to have it at our expense.

#4 Guns are evil. The only people that should carry a concealed weapon in public are police, retired police, and criminals. Obama has gone on record and will continue to be on record against permits for concealed carry of firearms with the exception of police and retired police. That makes anyone who would carry a weapon outside of police or retired police a criminal. We know that criminals already break the laws in place, so further restricting gun ownership and rights would give more control to criminals. Also, Barack Obama strongly supports legislation outlawing “assault guns”, cheap guns, and high capacity magazines. He also believes that all guns should be registered with the federal government, microstamped, and taxed $500 each time it changes hands. This would make gun ownership virtually impossible for low income and poor people, the very people he claims to help. Who gives a rip about the 2nd Amendment?

#3 Marriage should not be defined as it currently is, between one man and one woman. Barack Obama strongly opposes the Defense of Marriage Act. Even though Obama says he is not a supporter of “Gay Marriage”, his actions do not line up with his campaign words. While this is not a defining issue for me, it is for many Americans. We also know that Obama supports adding homosexuality to the mix concerning hate speech in church. Churches could possibly lose their tax exempt status for simply saying that homosexuality is a sin. Who cares about the 1st Amendment anyway?

#2 Taxation should be a means of redistributing wealth. Rich people need to pay more taxes. We know that the government does not create wealth, they only take it through taxation, fines, and fees. So how better to start this trickling up than to take the opportunity from those who are trying to earn more and give it to those who do not. Who cares if those at the bottom pay taxes or not, let’s call the government handouts a “tax cut”. About 65% of Americans pay income taxes. Obama said he will cut taxes on 95% of Americans and raise it on 5%. Where did he come up with the magical number of $250,000 per year income as being rich anyway? Abe Lincoln, who was strongly pro labor would be beyond angry at Obama for his big government power grab and attempted socialist/redistributionist tax policy.

#1 Abortion should be legal at any stage of pregnancy, minors should be able to have an abortion without consent of their parents, and the taxpayer should foot the bill for those abortions. Barack Obama told Planned Parenthood that his first act as POTUS would be to sign FOCA (Freedom of Choice Act) which makes all abortion procedures legal at any stage of pregnancy (including “Partial Birth Abortion”), eliminates parental notification for minors, and specifically funds abortions for low income and poor with federal tax payer dollars. There is video of Obama’s speech to Planned Parenthood at the above link.


Filed under politics

Jobs, Benefits, and Thoughts

  • I was talking to someone at work this week, and he swore up and down that he was poor.  He works a job 3-4 days per week and makes roughly $55,000 per year.  He has a nice house, insurance for him, his wife, and his child, a nice car, goes out to eat when he wants, and does not lack for material goods, but he argued with me for 15 minutes that he is poor.  What is wrong with this picture?
  • I had another discussion for over an hour with a friend who is a veteran, pro-American, free market minded, and has a strong opinion (like myself and others who disagree with my position).  He raised some great ideas for ways to fix our current health care problems.  Be ware, this could be offensive.
  1. Make a separately run government health system of hospitals, doctor’s offices, and clinics which utilize students and doctors who went to school under a government contract who must give a certain number of years service at a very modest salary.
  2. The current medicaid recipients and income qualified get to use the services of this health system.  If you agree to those services, you waive the right to sue for monetary damages.
  3. Hospitals that are not under this system do not have to do more than basic treatment to stabilize a patient who shows up.
  4. Legislate a restriction on the amount of money that can be awarded for damages, both actual and punitive in court and mandate that attorneys cannot receive higher than a certain percentage of those damages, and institute a “loser pay”  requirement on the plaintiff side.
  • That should reduce expenses and the continued problem of costs being passed on to the payers from those whose bills are written off due to their inability to pay.  Those who utilize the private system through their insurance benefit from the weight of non payers being lifted, tort reform bringing relief to the massive liability insurance required for doctors to practice medicine, and the emergency care of the uninsured should be reduced if not ended.
  • As for our food stamps system, why do we give cards to those receiving benefits to go to a grocery store where they can buy name brand products, cola, candy, and cake?  I am of the belief that grocery stores and big food companies have lobbied the government for the current system.  A much more efficient system would be to end the qualification process so that everyone can benefit from government distributed food.  You could have surplus foods marked with “government issued” which would supply staples but no frills.  Milk, canned meat, rice, beans, and veggies available for all.
  • As a case manager for 7 years, I have seen the cart of many food stamp recipients.  This may not apply to some of you out there who receive food stamps, so do not take offense if not applicable.  But many times it is filled with sugary snacks, junk food, name brand colas, name brand cereal, and so forth.  I am no person to look for nutritional advice from, but if you look in my grocery cart (paid for with money I have had to earn) you will find fresh meat, frozen veggies, cheese, lettuce, and very rarely a case of store brand cola.  Yet, a food stamps EBT card cannot be used to purchase cleaning supplies, bleach, diapers, or toilet paper.  Something is wrong with this picture.
  • If you closed out the current system, it would be so much more cost efficient, it would end the common practice of food stamp recipients of buying groceries for people without benefits and selling them for cash at a discount rate so that they can purchase booze, cigarettes, and even drugs.  If people are forced to go to a government center to receive their benefits or vouchers for commodities and staples, it would hopefully cut back on the fraud and place back a level of accountability on those who anonymously shop for their groceries without the stigma of the old food stamp system.
  • The current front runner according to the national polls believes in a system of taxation that is in essence a form of welfare.  95% of Americans under his plan will get a tax cut.  Roughly 60% of Americans pay taxes.  Therefore, if you look at this promise, there will be a significant portion of Americans who will receive more tax refunds than they pay in, in some cases receiving a check even though they paid no taxes at all.
  • The purpose of taxation should be to fund legitimate functions of the government.  If it was about fairness, everyone would pay the same rate and all credits, deductions, and graduated rates would be stopped.  Taking people off the tax rolls completely takes away incentives to succeed and move from one class to another.
  • As a married couple who own a house and have no children, Marcela and I pay more in taxes than most.  We pay for schools we do not use, do not get to claim more exemptions on our taxes, and we do not get the child tax credits.  Those who have children and do not own a house or property get the credits for the children, they get to claim more people on their taxes, and they do not pay for the schools they use.  Like I said, our current tax system is not geared toward fairness, but welfareness (my new word).
  • Enough of that, lets talk about something else.  I am considering accepting the offer to take off Sunday so I can be at church.  Usually on Sundays, they ask for volunteers to go home since we are overstaffed on weekends.  If I go home, I will lose 8 hours of pay, but I will get to be at church.  I still have not decided.
  • I am considering heading down to Plantation Key for service if I do.  We will see.


Filed under Blogging, politics, thoughts